|
FLYING ISLANDS
Comparison of Reports from 1726 and 1959 |
|||||
|
Report #1
Data: Date: June 26, 1959 Time: 6:45 PM Place: Boianai, Papua, New Guinea Conditions: Clear Witness: William Booth Gill |
Reported in:
Australian Flying Saucer Review Vol. 1, No. 1, Dec 1959 |
||||
|
Mr. Gill was questioned concerning the size of the object. He disclaimed
ability to make such estimates but said he thought it was thirty-five or
forty feet at the bottom, and perhaps twenty feet at the top. He then was
asked if he attempted to establish contact with the pilots of the craft.
When asked about the reaction of the natives at the signal, Gill replied:
Gill was asked if they tried other methods of signaling. He stated they
used an electric torch.
|
||||
|
Report #2:
Date: Unknown Time: Unknown Place: Unknown Conditions: Clear Witness: Jonathan Swift |
Published in 1726
"The Voyage to Laputa: Book Three of Four Books" From "Travels to Several Remote Nations of the World" (Now known as "Gulliver's Travels") |
||
|
|
| COMMENTARY | |
| These two reports are both remarkable in their own right. They describe humanlike creatures occupying strange craft which hover in the air. | They are both even more remarkable in that one is a contemporary report on an alien craft while the other is a story buried in a major piece of satirical literature - yet they agree in many details. |
| GILL | SWIFT |
| Shape of Object | |
| "huge disk" | "an island in the air"
Swift later gives exact dimensions to show it was a huge disk. |
| Floating In The Air | |
| "hovered" | "seemed for a while to stand still" |
| Motion | |
| "the object swung like a pendulum"
"came quite close toward the ground" "ascended and remained very high" |
"to raise, or sink, or put it into a progressive motion" |
| Occupants Look Like Human Mortals | |
| "human beings on it"
"there were four men in all" |
"numbers of people"
"beheld some people" "a crowd gathered" |
|
Historic Confirmation Gen 19:1 Two angels came to Sodom in the evening; and Lot was sitting in the gate of Sodom. When Lot saw them, he rose to meet them, and bowed himself with his face to the earth, Heb 13:2 Do not neglect to show hospitality to strangers, for thereby some have entertained angels unawares. |
|
| Acknowledgment To The Ground Below | |
| "I waved one hand overhead and the figure did the same, as though a skipper on a boat waving to someone on a wharf" | "I found by their pointing towards me and to each other, that they plainly discovered me, although they made no return to my shouting." |
|
In neither case do they respond to shouting from the ground below. |
|
|
Purposeful Activity |
|
| "They would bend forward and appear to manipulate something on the deck, and then straighten themselves up occasionally, would turn around in our direction, but on the whole they were interested in something on the deck" | In the lowest gallery, I beheld some people fishing with long angling-rods, and others looking on. |
| Appearance | |
| "it sparkled, and because
it was very, very bright." |
"the bottom flat, smooth,
and shining very bright " |
| Structure | |
| "with smaller round superstructures, then again on top of that another kind of superstructure, round, rather like the bridge on a boat" | "encompassed with several gradations of galleries, and stairs, at certain intervals, to descend from one to the other" |
| Astonishment | |
|
"The whole thing was most extraordinary" |
"The reader can hardly conceive my astonishment"
|
|
These many items show the amazing strength of the parallels between
the two accounts. Although there are differences in activity, the
time of day, and the circumstances, the similarities are striking.
Importantly, the activity seems designed to bring attention to our visitors. They produced an event which was written indelibly upon the mind of the witness. Even more, the parallels are so striking that one is led to believe the activities were coordinated over centuries of time to provide these highly illuminating accounts. The report by Gill can be taken at face value; it is simply the account of an experience contemporary with our own time. The account by Swift cannot be taken at face value. It occurs in a work of satire, always regarded as fiction since it was first published in 1726. |
Gill was a graduate of Brisbane University in Queensland, Australia,
and ordained as a priest of the Church of England. He had worked on the
staff of the Anglican Mission in Papua, New Guinea for thirteen years when
the event took place. The phenomenon was observed on several consecutive
evenings; thirty-seven witnesses signed affidavits attesting to the event.
In light of the fact that many thousands of reports on strange objects in the sky are recognized by official agencies, that many of us have been personal witness or know someone who was a personal witness to such phenomena, that Gill is contemporary to us and does not command interest beyond the unique nature of his report, and that his experience took place with several dozen other witnesses, we may not feel a high degree of interest in Gill himself. However, Swift is a different matter. Who was he? What was his background? How could such an account be written by him and buried in a major work of literary satire? |