| THE ORIGIN OF THE URANTIA PAPERS | |
TABLE OF CONTENTS Click on item to go directly to that text. |
|
|
From rumors that circulate about
the appearance of the Revelation, from statements and anecdotes related
by Sadler and other family members, and from our habitual notions of "channeling,"
everyone concludes that the Papers were channeled. The idea of a "Sleeping
Subject" and parallels with Edgar Cayce, lead everyone to that conclusion.
The question we all must address, if we are interested in getting at the actual process of the Revelation, is this: How did our planetary supervisors expect to condition Sadler to the event of a divine Revelation? They could not just drop it on him from out of the blue. He would not have accepted it. He would have thought someone was playing a joke on him. (In fact, at the initial stages of the miracle, he did indeed believe someone was playing a joke on him.) He would not have had twenty years of preparation to the new, and startling, concepts. Sadler was a stick-in-the-mud mid-western traditionalist. He believed in God and country. He believed in Christianity. He believed in the Jesus of tradition. Until he became thoroughly disillusioned with Ellen White and John Harvey Kellogg, he was a dyed-in-the-wool Seventh Day Adventist. He left the Church because of the internecine warfare, and because he was stabbed in the back by Kellogg. But those personal events were highly important to prepare Sadler psychologically. They created deep disillusionment with human theological "authority." Sadler no longer trusted human mortals as sources of divine truth, although he continued to respect Ellen White's "inspirations" for their religious value, not their divine authenticity. That was years before he met SS. But he continued for many years after the first event of SS, and after the actual event of the Revelation, as a traditional Christian believer, and a member of a formal religious congregation. Our planetary supervisors had to devise some method by which they could get Sadler's attention, and condition him to their presence. They used his profession as a Doctor, and they used his views on "psychic" phenomena and "spiritualism." He was adamant that such things were from the subconscious or marginal consciousness of the mind. From his youthful adult days in articles in Seventh Day Adventist publications, to his many books throughout his life, he never seriously departed from such views. Although Sadler publicly admitted to the possibility of contact from divine agencies, (after all, it was Bible teaching), certainly reinforced later from his experience with the Revelation, his explanation for psychic phenomena was always as a natural but abnormal product of the human mind. Therefore, he was particularly suspicious of any "psychic" performance. This background made him ideal for the event of revelation. SS had to be so different in behavior that Sadler would not immediately discard him as a psychic. In the late 1920's, when the Forum members were willing to accept the Papers as a divine revelation, Sadler still clung to the notion that this was some unusual psychic phenomena he could not classify. That is why the unusual behavior of SS held him for so many years. He would not let go. Not until the Jesus Papers came, and he began to read the descriptions of the apostles, was he finally converted. He recognized that no human author or psychologist would have had the insights into those personalities as displayed in The Urantia Papers. But that did not happen until the late 1930's. Thus the process of the revelation came squarely onto the shoulders of a trained professional, who was thoroughly familiar with human mental and psychic behavior, and who was highly skeptical in his acceptance of any unusual phenomena. That it took thirty years to convince Sadler is testimony to his tenacity for a natural explanation. The conditioning of Sadler was a crucial part of the process of the revelation. It involved a method which everyone believes was channeling, but which Sadler could not classify as a psychic phenomenon. Not until The Urantia Papers appeared miraculously could he with all honesty and truthfulness say:
The "above phenomena" were an exhaustive list of every conceivable form of psychic or abnormal mental phenomena he could devise. He made the statement at a meeting in 1958 with a group of ministers from mainline churches. That meeting was called at the request of Meredith Sprunger, a minister in the United Church of Christ, because many were questioning the origin of the Papers. (Meredith had spent many hours in private conversations with Sadler.) Two essential questions face us. First, could our planetary supervisors have devised another method of presentation?
|
The answer to this question enters
the realm of imagination. How could spirit beings communicate with the
material world in a manner that would be accepted by human mortals? They
certainly could not place it on a library shelf in the hope that someone
might accidentally find it. Would persons who found such a book believe
it? Would they not think of it as just another book of strange material
and put it back on the shelf, as so many have done? Would most persons
not reject "stealing" someone else's work? How many persons possess the
necessary resources to do something even if they did believe such strange
work should be made known to others? How could they contact a publisher
to obtain promotion rights if no publisher were shown? How could a firm
material foundation from a single believer be built which would ensure
survival in the world? How long would it take to convince another person,
or even groups of persons, to accept the book as worthy of reproduction?
We could go on and on, speculating about possible alternate routes, and
second guessing the wisdom of our Revelators.
Other observations are important. The testimony and anecdotes of Sadler, his family members, and the Forum became a critical part of the process of recognition of The Urantia Papers as a divine revelation. If the Papers had appeared mysteriously on some library shelf that background would be missing. We would not know where to place the work. We might think of it as strictly out of some anonymous person's imagination, regardless of the profundity or nobility of its conceptual presentations. Who could tell? A history had to develop, no matter how informal, of the celestial origins of the Papers. That history was a critical part of the recognition of the Papers as a divine revelation. Here we can understand the importance of the role of the Forum members. Through the interplay of questions and celestial answers, a group of dedicated human mortals, extending beyond Sadler's private family, was developed. They were intimately involved in exchange with spirit personalities; they were willing to testify to the remarkable, even miraculous, nature of the Revelation. They could place on public record their devotion and high regard for the work. Some members of the Forum gave major portions of their private finances, or jeopardized their personal well being, for the Revelation. Those persons included Robert Burton and Clyde Bedell. (Again, both were pragmatic, practical minded business men who rejected "psychic" performances in all its forms and varieties.) Clyde Bedell's Concordex contributed much to help build this public recognition. Thus the Forum members helped strengthen public recognition of the Papers as a divine Revelation beyond mere financial support for printing and publication. Everyone would come, asking how the Papers originated, and who was involved in their creation. This knowledge and influence then spread to other people, as many of us today are witness, and on out to the rest of the world. Indeed, the coming contests between "alien" explanations from a godless and unbelieving world, and actual origins from God, have this foundation on which to build. Second, could our planetary supervisors have chosen someone else for the task? The answer to this question goes back to the human pool upon which to draw. There are only so many persons who would have been trained to such task. It involved elements of self discipline. It involved elements of fortitude, and mettle not possessed by many people. Hard-nosed business men might have possessed such attributes but they were mostly secular; they would not have been good candidates. The godless and academic intelligentsia would not have been candidates. Christian ministers would not have been candidates; few of them had gone through a process of personal disillusionment to make them skeptical of human theological "authority." (Remember, we are in the early years of this century, with traditional values still pervading Christianity.) On the other hand, it had to be someone with a respect for God. It had to be someone with sufficient training to deal with the process. It had to be someone with a very practical view of the world, with feet on the ground, and with considerable experience in human mental phenomena. Few such persons existed. And among them even fewer would have the combination of strong religious and psychiatric interests possessed by Sadler. So, as one considers qualifications, the realm of likely candidates shrinks more and more. (Upon publication of his "Theory and Practice of Psychiatry" in 1936 Sadler was universally praised by the psychiatric profession and professional journals for his thorough treatment of the subject, and for his concentration on the health benefits of religion in the lives of individuals. The book was a center piece of instruction in many medical schools for years. And it came from a man who had no formal training in psychiatry.) From such considerations perhaps we can better understand why the process was particularly tuned to Sadler, his training, and his personality. |